Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579771›Full record

ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2018

Animal models of necrotizing enterocolitis: review of the literature and state of the art.

Adrienne Sulistyo, Abidur Rahman, George Biouss, Lina Antounians, Augusto Zani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. A Mouse Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Animal models of necrotizing enterocolitis.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrienne SulistyoDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Abidur RahmanDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
George BioussDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Lina AntouniansDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Augusto ZaniDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada, ext. 202413.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains the leading cause of gastrointestinal surgical emergency in preterm neonates. Over the last five decades, a variety of experimental models have been developed to study the pathophysiology of this disease and to test the effectiveness of novel therapeutic strategies. Experimental NEC is mainly modeled in neonatal rats, mice and piglets. In this review, we focus on these experimental models and discuss the major advantages and disadvantages of each. We also briefly discuss other models that are not as widely used but have contributed to our current knowledge of NEC.

Indexed as

micemutantNECpigrattransgenic

Identifiers

PMID31579771
PMCPMC6604570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.