ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2018
Imaging of colorectal cancer - the clue to individualized treatment.
Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Contrast agent strategies in elective oncological imaging].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven body composition analysis and its association with survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2026Article
- [Imaging of colorectal cancer: Role of computed tomography colonography].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Comparison between Substance P and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Their Receptors in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Recent developments in cancer diagnosis and treatment using nanotechnology.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Serum small RNAs in metastatic colorectal cancer predict response to chemotherapy and characterize high-risk patients.Molecular cancer · 2024Article
- Building an Efficient Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Program Despite the Lower-Middle-Income Barriers: Ukraine Experience.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of flexible endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the tumor height in rectal cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Added value of quantitative, multiparametric 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the locoregional staging of rectal cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases and Biotherapies.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Osteopontin Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Invasion and the Stem Cell-Like Properties through the PI3K-AKT-GSK/3β-β/Catenin Pathway.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal neoplasm and the second most common cause for cancer-related death in Europe. Imaging plays an important role both in the primary diagnosis, treatment evaluation, follow-up, and, to some extent, also in prevention. Like in the clinical setting, colon and rectal cancer have to be distinguished as two quite separate entities with different goals of imaging and, consequently, also different technical requirements. Over the past decade, there have been improvements in both more robust imaging techniques and new data and guidelines that help to use the optimal imaging modality for each scenario. For colon cancer, the continued research on computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) has led to high-level evidence that puts this technique on eye height to optical colonoscopy in terms of detection of cancer and polyps ≥10 mm. However, also for smaller polyps and thus for screening purposes, CTC seems to be an optimal tool. In rectal cancer, the technical requirements to perform state-of-the art imaging have recently been defined. Evaluation of T-stage, mesorectal fascia infiltration and extramural vascular invasion are the most important prognostic factors that can be identified on MRI. With this information, risk stratification both for local and distal failure is possible, enabling the clinician to tailor the optimal therapeutic approach in non-metastatic rectal cancer. Imaging of metastatic CRC is also covered, although the complex ramifications of treatment options in the metastatic setting are beyond the scope of this article. In this review, the most important recent developments in the imaging of colon and rectal cancer will be highlighted. If used in an interdisciplinary setting, this can lead to an individualized treatment concept for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.