ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2017
Paradigm shift: cognitive surgery.
Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering and Its Influence on Healthcare Structure: Current and Future Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Aberrant anatomy in the context of the critical view of safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Experimental evaluation of accuracy and efficiency of two control strategies for a novel foot commanded robotic laparoscope holders with surgeons.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- [Technical innovations and future perspectives].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- [Oncological surgery in the interdisciplinary context-On the way to personalized medicine].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiothoracic surgery.Minerva cardioangiologica · 2020Review
- Surgery 4.0: the natural culmination of the industrial revolution?Innovative surgical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last hundred years surgery has experienced a dramatic increase of scientific knowledge and innovation. The need to consider best available evidence and to apply technical innovations, such as minimally invasive approaches, challenges the surgeon both intellectually and manually. In order to overcome this challenge, computer scientists and surgeons within the interdisciplinary field of "cognitive surgery" explore and innovate new ways of data processing and management. This article gives a general overview of the topic and outlines selected pre-, intra- and postoperative applications. It explores the possibilities of new intelligent devices and software across the entire treatment process of patients ending in the consideration of an "Intelligent Hospital" or "Hospital 4.0", in which the borders between IT infrastructures, medical devices, medical personnel and patients are bridged by technology. Thereby, the "Hospital 4.0" is an intelligent system, which gives the right information, at the right time, at the right place to the individual stakeholder and thereby helps to decrease complications and improve clinical processes as well as patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.