ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2017
Surgical process modeling.
Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Operating Room Performance Optimization Metrics: a Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- The Sequence of Steps: A Key Concept Missing in Surgical Training-A Systematic Review and Recommendations to Include It.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Process-oriented feedback for ultrasound-guided central venous access training: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Digital standardization in liver surgery through a surgical workflow management system: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Trial
- Sound source localization for spatial mapping of surgical actions in dynamic scenes.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical bleeding prediction using transformer: an application to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- In-depth characterization of a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedure based on surgical process modeling.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- A Standardized Temporal Segmentation Framework and Annotation Resource Library in Robotic Surgery.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Statistical Surgical Process Modeling: Analysis of Workflow and Performance of Emerging Technologies in Image-Guided Spine Surgery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- The future of cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- A surgical activity model of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for co-operation with collaborative robots.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Surgical phase and instrument recognition: how to identify appropriate dataset splits.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Autonomous System for Tumor Resection (ASTR) - Dual-Arm Robotic Midline Partial Glossectomy.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024Article
- A comparison between a maximum care university hospital and an outpatient clinic - potential for optimization in arthroscopic workflows?BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Translation of Medical AR Research into Clinical Practice.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Video Analysis Using Temporal, Attention, and Multi-Feature Fusion Based-Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evolution and Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Cataract Surgery.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- Movement-level process modeling of microsurgical bimanual and unimanual tasks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Surgical Process Modeling for Open Spinal Surgeries.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the rapidly evolving medical, technological, and technical possibilities, surgical procedures are becoming more and more complex. On the one hand, this offers an increasing number of advantages for patients, such as enhanced patient safety, minimal invasive interventions, and less medical malpractices. On the other hand, it also heightens pressure on surgeons and other clinical staff and has brought about a new policy in hospitals, which must rely on a great number of economic, social, psychological, qualitative, practical, and technological resources. As a result, medical disciplines, such as surgery, are slowly merging with technical disciplines. However, this synergy is not yet fully matured. The current information and communication technology in hospitals cannot manage the clinical and operational sequence adequately. The consequences are breaches in the surgical workflow, extensions in procedure times, and media disruptions. Furthermore, the data accrued in operating rooms (ORs) by surgeons and systems are not sufficiently implemented. A flood of information, "big data", is available from information systems. That might be deployed in the context of Medicine 4.0 to facilitate the surgical treatment. However, it is unused due to infrastructure breaches or communication errors. Surgical process models (SPMs) alleviate these problems. They can be defined as simplified, formal, or semiformal representations of a network of surgery-related activities, reflecting a predefined subset of interest. They can employ different means of generation, languages, and data acquisition strategies. They can represent surgical interventions with high resolution, offering qualifiable and quantifiable information on the course of the intervention on the level of single, minute, surgical work-steps. The basic idea is to gather information concerning the surgical intervention and its activities, such as performance time, surgical instrument used, trajectories, movements, or intervention phases. These data can be gathered by means of workflow recordings. These recordings are abstracted to represent an individual surgical process as a model and are an essential requirement to enable Medicine 4.0 in the OR. Further abstraction can be generated by merging individual process models to form generic SPMs to increase the validity for a larger number of patients. Furthermore, these models can be applied in a wide variety of use-cases. In this regard, the term "modeling" can be used to support either one or more of the following tasks: "to describe", "to understand", "to explain", to optimize", "to learn", "to teach", or "to automate". Possible use-cases are requirements analyses, evaluating surgical assist systems, generating surgeon-specific training-recommendation, creating workflow management systems for ORs, and comparing different surgical strategies. The presented chapter will give an introduction into this challenging topic, presenting different methods to generate SPMs from the workflow in the OR, as well as various use-cases, and state-of-the-art research in this field. Although many examples in the article are given according to SPMs that were computed based on observations, the same approaches can be easily applied to SPMs that were measured automatically and mined from big data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.