Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579574›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

In situ growth and bioerosion rates of

Janina V Büscher, Max Wisshak, Armin U Form, Jürgen Titschack, Kerstin Nachtigall, Ulf Riebesell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Building like a Coral-Parallelized, Multiscale Biofabrication.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janina V BüscherBiological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Max WisshakMarine Research Department, Senckenberg am Meer, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Armin U FormBiological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Jürgen TitschackMarine Research Department, Senckenberg am Meer, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-9688
Kerstin NachtigallBiological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Ulf RiebesellBiological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9442-452X
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel · DELeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research · DESenckenberg am Meer · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reef resilience depends on the balance between carbonate precipitation, leading to reef growth, and carbonate degradation, for example, through bioerosion. Changes in environmental conditions are likely to affect the two processes differently, thereby shifting the balance between reef growth and degradation. In cold-water corals estimates of accretion-erosion processes in their natural habitat are scarce and solely live coral growth rates were studied with regard to future environmental changes in the laboratory so far, limiting our ability to assess the potential of cold-water coral reef ecosystems to cope with environmental changes. In the present study, growth rates of the two predominant colour morphotypes of live

Indexed as

BioerosionCold-Water CoralsGrowthInshore vs. offshoreIn situ studyLophelia pertusaMortalityNorth Atlantic

Identifiers

PMID31579574
PMCPMC6764366
OpenAlexW2955477900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.