Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579570›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

The sugarcane mitochondrial genome: assembly, phylogenetics and transcriptomics.

Dyfed Lloyd Evans, Thandekile Thandiwe Hlongwane, Shailesh V Joshi, Diego M Riaño Pachón

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discovery of a defence-response gene forFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative mitochondrial genomics of cultivatedFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Recent advances inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. De Novo Hybrid Assembly Unveils Multi-Chromosomal Mitochondrial Genomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The complete mitogenome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Mitochondrial Genome ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Dyfed Lloyd EvansPlant Breeding, South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-8384
Thandekile Thandiwe HlongwanePlant Breeding, South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Shailesh V JoshiPlant Breeding, South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Diego M Riaño PachónComputational, Evolutionary and Systems Biology Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9803-3465
South African Sugarcane Research Institute · ZAUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChloroplast genomes provide insufficient phylogenetic information to distinguish between closely related sugarcane cultivars, due to the recent origin of many cultivars and the conserved sequence of the chloroplast. In comparison, the mitochondrial genome of plants is much larger and more plastic and could contain increased phylogenetic signals. We assembled a consensus reference mitochondrion with Illumina TruSeq synthetic long reads and Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION long reads. Based on this assembly we also analyzed the mitochondrial transcriptomes of sugarcane and sorghum and improved the annotation of the sugarcane mitochondrion as compared with other species.

methodsMitochondrial genomes were assembled from genomic read pools using a bait and assemble methodology. The mitogenome was exhaustively annotated using BLAST and transcript datasets were mapped with HISAT2 prior to analysis with the Integrated Genome Viewer.

resultsThe sugarcane mitochondrion is comprised of two independent chromosomes, for which there is no evidence of recombination. Based on the reference assembly from the sugarcane cultivar SP80-3280 the mitogenomes of four additional cultivars (R570, LCP85-384, RB72343 and SP70-1143) were assembled (with the SP70-1143 assembly utilizing both genomic and transcriptomic data). We demonstrate that the sugarcane plastome is completely transcribed and we assembled the chloroplast genome of SP80-3280 using transcriptomic data only. Phylogenomic analysis using mitogenomes allow closely related sugarcane cultivars to be distinguished and supports the discrimination between

conclusionTranscript processing in the sugarcane mitochondrion is highly complex with diverse splice events, the majority of which span the two chromosomes. PolyA baited transcripts are consistent with the use of polyadenylation for transcript degradation. For the first time we annotate two CMS factors within the sugarcane mitochondrion and demonstrate that sugarcane possesses all the molecular machinery required for CMS and rescue. A mechanism of cross-chromosomal splicing based on guide RNAs is proposed. We also demonstrate that mitogenomes can be used to perform phylogenomic studies on sugarcane cultivars.

Indexed as

Cytoplasmic male sterilityMitochondriaPhylogeneticsPlastomesRNA splicingSaccharum cultumSugarcaneSugarcane origins

Identifiers

PMID31579570
PMCPMC6764373
OpenAlexW2977185725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.