Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579561›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Pangenomic type III effector database of the plant pathogenic

Cyrus Raja Rubenstein Sabbagh, Sebastien Carrere, Fabien Lonjon, Fabienne Vailleau, Alberto P Macho, Stephane Genin, Nemo Peeters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Meta-analysis of theMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. ThePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Dialog ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Horticulture research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Comprehensive genome sequence analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cyrus Raja Rubenstein Sabbagh *LIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-tolosan, France.
Sebastien Carrere *LIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-0778
Fabien LonjonDepartment of Cell & Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fabienne VailleauLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-tolosan, France.
Alberto P MachoShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Stephane GeninLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2498-2400
Nemo PeetersLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-0769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bacterial plant pathogenic

methodsExpert genome annotation, followed by specific type III-dependent secretion, allowed us to improve our Hidden-Markov-Model and Blast profiles for the prediction of type III effectors.

resultsWe curated the T3E repertoires of 12 plant pathogenic

Indexed as

Bacterial wiltRalstonia solanacearum species complexType III effector

Identifiers

PMID31579561
PMCPMC6762002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.