Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579527›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental epigenetics2019

A gene regulatory network for Müllerian duct regression.

Malcolm M Moses, Richard R Behringer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mini review: Asymmetric Müllerian duct development in the chicken embryo.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Variants ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Characterization of XX Maleness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malcolm M MosesDepartment of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-3632
Richard R BehringerDepartment of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Female Reproductive Tract Development in the MouseR37HD030284 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BEHRINGER, RICHARD R · 2014 to 2023
$4.2M
Gene Regulatory Networks for Mullerian Duct RegressionF31HD106600 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MOSES, MALCOLM MAURIECE · 2021 to 2022
$63k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD106600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian embryos initially develop progenitor tissues for both male and female reproductive tract organs, known as the Wolffian ducts and the Müllerian ducts, respectively. Ultimately, each individual develops a single set of male or female reproductive tract organs. Therefore, an essential step for sex differentiation is the regression of one duct and growth and differentiation of the other duct. In males, this requires Müllerian duct regression and Wolffian duct growth and differentiation. Müllerian duct regression is induced by the expression of

Indexed as

anti-Müllerian hormonesex differentiationtranscription

Identifiers

PMID31579527
PMCPMC6760261
OpenAlexW2976866118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.