ArticleDigital health
Enemies and friends in high-tech places: the development and validation of the Online Social Experiences Measure.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relationship between online social support and problematic internet use: a three-level meta-analysis.BMC psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Are Online Social Experiences Associated With General Interpersonal Problems? A Circumplex Assessment.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring the association between social and emotional skills and online social experiences: a network analysis and latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Associations between dimensions of the social environment and cardiometabolic risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.SSM - population health · 2024Review
- A Humane Social Learning-Informed Metaverse: Cultivating Positive Technology Experiences in Digital Learning Environments.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2024Article
- Social media use and adolescents' well-being: A note on flourishing.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Negative experiences, social exclusion and unwanted attention on social media: exploring the association with adolescent alcohol use.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Positive and Negative Online Experiences and Loneliness in Peruvian Adolescents During the COVID-19 Lockdown.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021Article
- Measuring Online Wellbeing: A Scoping Review of Subjective Wellbeing Measures.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A Call for a Public Health Agenda for Social Media Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterpersonal positivity and negativity are separable dimensions both recognized as having important effects on health. Though online social interactions and research examining them are increasingly common, no validated instrument has heretofore been developed to examine social support and social negativity specifically in online contexts. The present studies describe the development and validation of the Online Social Experiences Measure (OSEM) to allow for assessment of online social positivity and negativity simultaneously. METHODS AND
resultsIn Study I, responses to a potential item pool were collected from participants (
conclusionsOverall, results suggest online social positivity and negativity may have implications for physical health, and that the OSEM may be a useful tool in understanding online social processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.