Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579485›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2019

Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test.

Francesco Coscia, Paola V Gigliotti, Alexander Piratinskij, Tiziana Pietrangelo, Vittore Verratti, Saadsaoud Foued, Igor Diemberger, Giorgio Fanò-Illic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco CosciaDepartment of Medicine, University of Perugia, Ospedale "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Italy.
Paola V GigliottiDepartment of Medicine, University of Perugia, Ospedale "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Italy.
Alexander PiratinskijThe Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Tiziana PietrangeloDepartment of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Science, InterUniversity Institute of Myology, University G d'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Vittore VerrattiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Health and Territory, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Saadsaoud FouedMaitre de Conference Class A, Universite de Msila, Algerie.
Igor DiembergerInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Italy.
Giorgio Fanò-IllicIIM-Interuniversity Institute of Myology.
Institut de Myologie · FRUniversity of Perugia · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUral Federal University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global Proprioceptive Resonance (GPR) is a recently developed approach conceived to solicit the various cutaneous mechanoreceptors, through application of mechanical multifocal vibration at low amplitude and at definite body sites, limiting the stimulation of the profound structures. This interventional study evaluated the effects of GPR on cardiorespiratory function during the post-exertional recovery period. A group of volunteers involved in Triathlon (a multisport discipline consisting of sequential swim, cycle, and run disciplines higly demanding in terms of metabolic engagment), underwent two maximal incremental exercise tests until exhaustion followed alternatively to (a) a 13 minutes section of GPR or (b) a standard low intensity exercise acute trend of the same duration. These effects of these two approaches were compared in terms of recovery of: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and venous lactate concentration (Lac). The physiological parameters (HR, RR, SpO2 and Lac) recorded in the pre-exertion session showed similar values between the 40 volunteers while several differences were recorded in the post-exertion phase. After 6 min of GPR recovery it was recorded a drop in RR below baseline (19.4±4.15 min-1 vs. 12.2± 0.4 min-1; p<0.001) coupled with an increase in peripheral oxygen saturation above the baseline (GPR: 99.0%±0.16% vs. 96.6%±0.77%, p<0.001). Moreover, the most striking result was the drop in lactate concentration measured after 13 min of GPR recovery: 84.5±3.5% in GPR vs 2.9±7.6% reduction in standard recovery (p<0.001). Notably no differences were recorded recovery of heart rate. GPR has promising effects on post-exercise recovery on RR, SpO2 and lactate level on young athletes.

Indexed as

global proprioceptive resonanceincremental testrecovery phase

Identifiers

PMID31579485
PMCPMC6767843
OpenAlexW2970194779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.