Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579434›Full record

ArticleComparative cytogenetics2019

New evidence for the presence of the telomere motif (TTAGG)

Snejana Grozeva, Boris A Anokhin, Nikolay Simov, Valentina G Kuznetsova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A new species of the genusComparative cytogenetics · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Snejana GrozevaCytotaxonomy and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1000, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel, Bulgaria Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-8068
Boris A AnokhinDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Universitetskaya nab., 1, Russia Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg Russia.
Nikolay SimovNational Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1000, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel, Bulgaria National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria.
Valentina G KuznetsovaDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Universitetskaya nab., 1, Russia Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg Russia.
Zoological Institute · RUInstitute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research · BGNational Museum of Natural History · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male karyotype and meiosis in four true bug species belonging to the families Reduviidae, Nabidae, and Miridae (Cimicomorpha) were studied for the first time using Giemsa staining and FISH with 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG)

Indexed as

HeteropteraHoristus orientalisNabis sareptanusRhynocoris punctiventrisR. iracundusTTAGG-FISH

Identifiers

PMID31579434
PMCPMC6765027
OpenAlexW2974192568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.