Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579398›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2019

[Variations in the detection of congenital Zika syndrome associated with changes in protocolsVariación de la detección del síndrome congénito por el virus del Zika en función de los cambios de los protocolos].

Helaine Jacinta Salvador Mocelin, Thiago Nascimento do Prado, Paula de Souza Silva Freitas, Adelmo Inácio Bertolde, Freddy Perez, Lee W Riley, Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helaine Jacinta Salvador MocelinUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi) Vitória (ES) Brasil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi), Vitória (ES), Brasil.
Thiago Nascimento do PradoUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi) Vitória (ES) Brasil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi), Vitória (ES), Brasil.
Paula de Souza Silva FreitasUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi) Vitória (ES) Brasil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi), Vitória (ES), Brasil.
Adelmo Inácio BertoldeUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Departamento de Estatística Vitória (ES) Brasil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Departamento de Estatística, Vitória (ES), Brasil.
Freddy PerezOrganização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) Departamentos de Doenças Transmissíveis e Determinantes Ambientais da Saúde Washington (DC) Estados Unidos Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS), Departamentos de Doenças Transmissíveis e Determinantes Ambientais da Saúde, Washington (DC), Estados Unidos.
Lee W RileyUniversidade da Califórnia, Escola de Saúde Pública Divisão de Doenças Infecciosas e Vacinologia Berkeley (CA) Estados Unidos Universidade da Califórnia, Escola de Saúde Pública, Divisão de Doenças Infecciosas e Vacinologia, Berkeley (CA), Estados Unidos.
Ethel Leonor Noia MacielUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi) Vitória (ES) Brasil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Laboratório de Epidemiologia (Lab-Epi), Vitória (ES), Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BREscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde · BRPan American Health Organization (Brasil) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, Brazil faced a Zika virus epidemic that spread to other countries in the world. As a result, recommendations regarding reporting criteria for congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) were issued in the form of protocols. The frequent changes in these recommendations may have affected clinical management and the access to post-diagnostic support by children who were affected by CZS, but who ended up not being identified. In the present study, 39 cases of CZS reported in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2016 were re-classified in terms of diagnosis using the current protocol, which is different from the protocol used in 2015. According to this re-classification, only eight out of 36 cases would be confirmed, based on the criterion of two or more signs or symptoms of CZS with or without microcephaly plus positive serologic results. Also, considering the decrease in the head circumference cut-off point defining microcephaly, 17 cases would no longer meet the definition for this condition. Even though the current protocol does not rely on head circumference alone for CZS reporting and confirmation, it should be noted that this is still the main sign considered by health care teams, and therefore the decrease in the cut-off point might have compromised early CZS detection. A review of "ruled out" cases would be advisable in moments of protocol transition to determine whether these cases have been correctly classified.

Indexed as

Brazilcommunicable diseasesmicrocephalypublic healthZika virus

Identifiers

PMID31579398
PMCPMC6752177
OpenAlexW2973299530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.