Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579345›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2019

Weighted Graph Regularized Sparse Brain Network Construction for MCI Identification.

Renping Yu, Lishan Qiao, Mingming Chen, Seong-Whan Lee, Xuan Fei, Dinggang Shen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Topological clustering of multilayer networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Research on brain network for schizophrenia classification based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Renping YuHenan Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Brain-Computer interface Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electric Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Lishan QiaoSchool of Mathematics Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Mingming ChenHenan Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Brain-Computer interface Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electric Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Seong-Whan LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Xuan FeiCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Dinggang ShenIDEA Lab, Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Zhengzhou University of Light Industry · CNHenan University of Technology · CNKorea University · KRLiaocheng University · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Using Dynamic High-Order Brain NetworksR01EB022880 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain functional networks (BFNs) constructed from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) have been widely applied to the analysis and diagnosis of brain diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and its prodrome, namely mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Constructing a meaningful brain network based on, for example, sparse representation (SR) is the most essential step prior to the subsequent analysis or disease identification. However, the independent coding process of SR fails to capture the intrinsic locality and similarity characteristics in the data. To address this problem, we propose a novel weighted graph (Laplacian) regularized SR framework, based on which BFN can be optimized by considering both intrinsic correlation similarity and local manifold structure in the data, as well as sparsity prior of the brain connectivity. Additionally, the non-convergence of the graph Laplacian in the self-representation model has been solved properly. Combined with a pipeline of sparse feature selection and classification, the effectiveness of our proposed method is demonstrated by identifying MCI based on the constructed BFNs.

Indexed as

brain functional networkGraph Laplacian regularizationmild cognitive impairment (MCI)sparse representation

Identifiers

PMID31579345
PMCPMC6774646
OpenAlexW2908835407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.