Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579228›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2019

A Survey on Voiding Complaints in Women Presenting at a Pelvic Care Center.

Heidi Moossdorff-Steinhauser, Kevin L J Rademakers, Fred Nieman, Gommert A van Koeveringe, Bary Berghmans

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi Moossdorff-SteinhauserMaastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Kevin L J RademakersDepartment of Urology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Fred NiemanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Gommert A van KoeveringeDepartment of Urology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Bary BerghmansPelvic Care Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article reports the prevalence of self-reported voiding complaints and the relationship with other pelvic floor and bladder dysfunctions (PFD). MATERIALS AND

methodsWomen with a variety of PFDs were referred to the pelvic care center. A standardised questionnaire on 6 PFDs was used. Frequencies of patient characteristics, PFDs and voiding complaints were calculated. Cross tabulation was used to investigate correlations and Pearson correlation coefficients to reveal the strength of the association between PFDs and self-reported voiding complaints.

resultsData of 4470 women were included. Prevalence of (self-reported) voiding Lower urinary tract symptoms was 59.5%. Incomplete bladder emptying is the most prevalent voiding complaint. Self-reported voiding complaints are weakly correlated to age (r = 0.15, p < 0.01) and have moderate correlation with self-reported recurrent urinary tract infections (r = 0.34, p < 0.01), pelvic floor, bladder and bowel complaints. However, the correlation between the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying and the presence of recurrent urinary tract infections is weak (r = 0.06, p = 0.02).

conclusionVoiding complaints have a high prevalence and symptom bother in women visiting a pelvic care center.

Indexed as

FemaleLower urinary tract symptomsPrevalenceSelf-reportUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID31579228
PMCPMC6771055
OpenAlexW2973146359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.