Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579157›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry

Perspectives, attitude, and practice of lithium prescription among psychiatrists in India.

Sucharita Mandal, Spoorthy Sai Mamidipalli, Bhaskar Mukherjee, Suchandra K Hari Hara

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04222816 (Effect of Regulated Add -on Sodium Chloride Intake on Stabilization of Serum Lithium Concentration in Bipolar Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04222816 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Regulated Add -on Sodium Chloride Intake on Stabilization of Serum Lithium Concentration in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsBipolar Affective DisorderArmsLithium Carbonate, Sodium chloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sucharita MandalDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Spoorthy Sai MamidipalliDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Bhaskar MukherjeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Malda Medical College, Malda, West Bengal, India.
Suchandra K Hari HaraDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLithium "the magic pill" past its discovery remained the respite for patients with bipolar disorders for decades. The prescriptions of lithium were replaced by other drugs because of the cumbersome monitoring, adverse effect profile, narrow therapeutic index, and frequent comorbidities in patients. The objectives of this study were to understand the knowledge, attitude, and practice of lithium by a subset of psychiatrists in India, which will help us understand the theory-practice gap and for devising strategies to bridge the existing gap. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe current study was an online survey which included 103 psychiatrists from India of either gender and any age group. Predesigned questionnaire about the knowledge, attitude, and practice of lithium use was circulated for 1 month (March 2018). We received 135 responses (31% response rate), of which 32 were incomplete. Hence, the total sample of psychiatrists included in the study was 103.

resultsThe results suggest that most practitioners included in the survey had knowledge about the effects, adverse effects, and the monitoring protocols and were comfortable in using lithium in patients on outpatient basis. Despite being aware of the indications, the psychiatrists were skeptical in starting lithium due to multitude of perceived barriers such as comorbidities, patient's low adherence to blood monitoring, and adverse effects.

conclusionsClinicians should be well aware of the adverse effects, monitoring protocols, which will help them to use lithium in a more appropriate manner.

Indexed as

Attitudeknowledgelithiumpracticepsychiatrists

Identifiers

PMID31579157
PMCPMC6767820
OpenAlexW2971979657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.