Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579132›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Experimental field evidence that out-group threats influence within-group behavior.

Amy Morris-Drake, Charlotte Christensen, Julie M Kern, Andrew N Radford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Variation between species, populations, groups and individuals in the fitness consequences of out-group conflict.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Intergroup aggression in meerkats.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy Morris-DrakeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-4651
Charlotte ChristensenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Julie M KernSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7619-8653
Andrew N RadfordSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-3463
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

European Research Council 682253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social species, conspecific outsiders present various threats to groups and their members. These out-group threats are predicted to affect subsequent within-group interactions (e.g., affiliation and aggression) and individual behavior (e.g., foraging and vigilance decisions). However, experimental investigations of such consequences are rare, especially in natural conditions. We used field-based call playbacks and fecal presentations on habituated wild dwarf mongooses (

Indexed as

behavioral consequencesconflictgroup livingout-group threatrival groupwithin-group behavior

Identifiers

PMID31579132
PMCPMC6765380
OpenAlexW2952721549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.