ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2019
Protein Tetratricopeptide Repeat and the Companion Non-tetratricopeptide Repeat Helices: Bioinformatic Analysis of Interhelical Interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Generalized AI View of Tricopeptide Repeats: What's in a Name.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An Analytical Review of the Structural Features of Pentatricopeptide Repeats: Strategic Amino Acids, Repeat Arrangements and Superhelical Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Evolution of Protein Structure and Stability in Global Warming.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The Uniqueness of Tryptophan in Biology: Properties, Metabolism, Interactions and Localization in Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) of proteins consists of a 34-amino acid, alpha-helical motif that comprises a pattern of small and large hydrophobic residues, leading to a recognizable signature sequence. Structural and functional studies have documented that tandem TPRs form a superhelix that interacts with client molecules through strategically placed amino acids. Interestingly, most of the known TPRs are flanked by alpha-helices that lack the TPR signature but often appear as a continuation of the TPR superhelix. The exact role and specificity of these TPR-accompanying non-TPR helices have remained a mystery. Here, starting with TPR proteins of known structure, bioinformatic analyses were conducted on these helices, which revealed that they are diverse in sequence, lacking a clear consensus. However, they display significant atomic contacts with the nearest TPR helix and, to some extent, with the next TPR helix over. The majority of these contacts do not use the signature residues of the TPR helix but rather involve hydrophobic side chains on the facing sides. Thus, compared with the TPR helices, these companion helices are generic in nature, and seem to serve as relatively passive gatekeepers, leaving the terminal TPR helices to encode the signature residues that interact with cognate clients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.