Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579023›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2019

Young People's Response to Six Smartphone Apps for Anxiety and Depression: Focus Group Study.

Sandra Garrido, Daniel Cheers, Katherine Boydell, Quang Vinh Nguyen, Emery Schubert, Laura Dunne, Tanya Meade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Developing a Safety Planning Smartphone App to Support Adolescents' Self-Management During Emotional Crises.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra GarridoMARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour & Development, Western Sydney Univerity, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-0044
Daniel CheersCatholic Care, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-4316
Katherine BoydellBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1464-8532
Quang Vinh NguyenWestern Sydney University, Parramatta, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-6224
Emery SchubertUniversity of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-8083
Laura DunneCatholic Care, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-6566
Tanya MeadeWestern Sydney University, Milperra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-5813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is one of the most frequent causes of death in young people worldwide. Depression lies at the root of this issue, a condition that has a significant negative impact on the lives of those who experience it and on society more generally. However, 80% of affected young people do not obtain professional help for depression and other mental health issues. Therefore, a key challenge is to find innovative and appealing ways to engage young people in learning to manage their mental health. Research suggests that young people prefer to access anonymous Web-based programs rather than get face-to-face help, which has led to the development of numerous smartphone apps. However, the evidence indicates that not all of these apps are effective in engaging the interest of young people who are most in need of help.

objectiveThe study aimed to investigate young people's response to six currently available smartphone apps for mental health and to identify features that young people like and dislike in such apps.

methodsFocus groups were conducted with 23 young people aged 13 to 25 years in which they viewed and used six smartphone apps for mental health. A general inductive approach following a realist paradigm guided data analysis.

resultsThe results revealed that young people value autonomy and the opportunity to personalize experiences with these apps above other things. Finding a balance between simplicity and informativeness is also an important factor.

conclusionsApp developers need to consider using participant-design frameworks to ensure that smartphone apps are providing what young people want in a mental health app. Solutions to the need for personalization and increasing user engagement are also crucially needed.

Indexed as

adolescentdepressionmental healthmobile phonesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID31579023
PMCPMC6915797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.