Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578484›Full record

ReviewNature2019

Harnessing innate immunity in cancer therapy.

Olivier Demaria, Stéphanie Cornen, Marc Daëron, Yannis Morel, Ruslan Medzhitov, Eric Vivier

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 545 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
545citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

545 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tumor-Infiltrating mregDCs Restrain Anti-Tumor Immunity in Early Relapse HCC.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Dynamic Alliance of p53 and Metabolism in the Tumor Microenvironment Shapes Tumor Evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

485 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivier DemariaInnate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Stéphanie CornenInnate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Marc DaëronAix Marseille Université, INSERM, CNRS, Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Marseille, France.
Yannis MorelInnate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Ruslan MedzhitovHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eric VivierInnate Pharma, Marseille, France. vivier@ciml.univ-mrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapies that promote antitumour immunity have been recently developed. Most of these immunomodulatory approaches have focused on enhancing T-cell responses, either by targeting inhibitory pathways with immune checkpoint inhibitors, or by targeting activating pathways, as with chimeric antigen receptor T cells or bispecific antibodies. Although these therapies have led to unprecedented successes, only a minority of patients with cancer benefit from these treatments, highlighting the need to identify new cells and molecules that could be exploited in the next generation of immunotherapy. Given the crucial role of innate immune responses in immunity, harnessing these responses opens up new possibilities for long-lasting, multilayered tumour control.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyNeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.