Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Selective bacterial colonization processes on polyethylene waste samples in an abandoned landfill site.

Edoardo Puglisi, Francesco Romaniello, Serena Galletti, Enrico Boccaleri, Alberto Frache, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recent advance of microbial mercury methylation in the environment.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. The soil plastisphere.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edoardo PuglisiDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Alimentari per la sostenibilità della filiera agro-alimentare, Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy. edoardo.puglisi@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-0971
Francesco RomanielloDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Alimentari per la sostenibilità della filiera agro-alimentare, Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.
Serena GallettiAAT- Advanced Analytical Technologies, Via Majavacca 12, 29017, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Piacenza, Italy.
Enrico BoccaleriDipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Via Michel 11, I-15121, Alessandria, Italy.
Alberto FracheDipartimento Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Teresa Michel 5, Alessandria, Italy.
Pier Sandro CocconcelliDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Alimentari per la sostenibilità della filiera agro-alimentare, Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial colonization of plastic wastes has been extensively studied in marine environments, while studies on aged terrestrial wastes are scarce, and mostly limited to the isolation of plastic-degrading microorganisms. Here we have applied a multidisciplinary approach involving culturomics, next-generation sequencing analyses and fine-scale physico-chemical measurements to characterize plastic wastes retrieved in landfill abandoned for more than 35 years, and to assess the composition of bacterial communities thriving as biofilms on the films' surfaces. All samples were characterized by different colors but were all of polyethylene; IR and DSC analyses identified different level of degradation, while FT-Raman spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence further assessed the degradation level and the presence of pigments. Each plastic type harbored distinct bacterial communities from the others, in agreement with the differences highlighted by the physico-chemical analyses. Furthermore, the most degraded polyethylene films were found to host a bacterial community more similar to the surrounding soil as revealed by both α- and β-diversity NGS analyses. This work confirms the novel hypothesis that different polyethylene terrestrial waste samples select for different bacterial communities, and that structure of these communities can be correlated with physico-chemical properties of the plastics, including the degradation degree.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologySolid WasteWaste Disposal FacilitiesBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiofilmsPolyethylenePolyethyleneSolid Waste

Identifiers

PMID31578444
PMCPMC6775442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.