Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578418›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey.

Erik Zettersten, Gabriella Jäderling, Emma Larsson, Max Bell

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sex matters: Is it time for a SOFA makeover?Critical care (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik ZetterstenPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden. erik.zettersten@sll.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-9924
Gabriella JäderlingPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma LarssonPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Max BellPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gender distribution in intensive care units is consistently found to be around 60% men and 40% women. This might be medically sound. Our main purpose with this study was to investigate if physicians admit men and women to the intensive care unit equally. We sought to answer this question using a blinded randomized survey study. We used an online survey tool, with a hyperlink on European society of intensive care medicine webpage. Responders were randomized to either a critical care case Jane or a critical care case John, otherwise identical. The responders were asked if they would admit Jane/John to an intensive care unit, yes or no. Possible differences in admittance rate on the basis of the gender of the patient were analysed. In addition, we analysed if the gender of the responder affected admittance rate, regardless of the gender of the patient. 70.1% of the responders randomized to the John case opted to admit, vs. 68.3% of the responders randomized to the Jane case, p = 0.341. Regardless the gender of the patient, 70.1% of male responders opted to admit the patient, vs. 69.7% of female responders, p = 0.886. In this blinded randomized multicentre survey study, we could not demonstrate any difference in willingness to admit a patient to ICU, solely based on the gender of the patient. Patient gender as a factor for ICU admittance. A blinded randomized survey.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingFemaleHospitals, UniversityHospitals, UrbanHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMedicineMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPhysiciansPhysicians, Women

Identifiers

PMID31578418
PMCPMC6775127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.