Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Decoding multifarious role of cow dung bacteria in mobilization of zinc fractions along with growth promotion of C. annuum L.

Kalpana Bhatt, Dinesh Kumar Maheshwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 3 Biotech · 2022
    Article
  5. Cow products: boon to human health and food security.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antibacterial assay guided isolation of a novel hydroxy-substituted pentacyclo ketonic compound from Pseudomonas aeruginosa MBTDCMFRI Ps04.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kalpana BhattDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India. Kalpana.kanubhatt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-6993
Dinesh Kumar MaheshwariDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc is one of the micronutrients, required by all types of crops. About 10-100ppm of zinc is present in soil which is generally immobile. The cow dung sustains all life and being practice since aeons. Exploitation of cow dung bacteria can mobilize nutrients besides contributing in sustainable agriculture. Therefore, to examine mobilization of Zn, cow dung is used as a source of bacteria. The objectives of the present study were to isolate an array of bacteria from cow dung and to characterize them for their Zn (ZnO and ZnCO

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsFertilizersAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaCapsicumCattleFecesFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLactationMagnesiumNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumRibotypingFertilizersMagnesiumNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumSoilZinc

Identifiers

PMID31578407
PMCPMC6775090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.