Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Microplastics in gentoo penguins from the Antarctic region.

Filipa Bessa, Norman Ratcliffe, Vanessa Otero, Paula Sobral, João C Marques, Claire M Waluda, Phil N Trathan, José C Xavier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microplastics in Cetaceans Stranded on the Portuguese Coast.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Filipa BessaMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Departamento das Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal. afbessa@uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-3710
Norman RatcliffeMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Departamento das Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vanessa OteroDepartment of Conservation and Restoration and LAQV-REQUIMTE, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516, Monte de Caparica, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-0773
Paula SobralMARE-NOVA - Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.
João C MarquesMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Departamento das Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal.
Claire M WaludaBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
Phil N TrathanBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
José C XavierMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Departamento das Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal.
British Antarctic Survey · GBUniversity of Coimbra · PTRede de Química e Tecnologia · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that microplastic pollution (<5 mm in size) is now present in virtually all marine ecosystems, even in remote areas, such as the Arctic and the Antarctic. Microplastics have been found in water and sediments of the Antarctic but little is known of their ingestion by higher predators and mechanisms of their entry into Antarctic marine food webs. The goal of this study was to assess the occurrence of microplastics in a top predator, the gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua from the Antarctic region (Bird Island, South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands) and hence assess the potential for microplastic transfer through Antarctic marine food webs. To achieve this, the presence of microplastics in scats (as a proof of ingestion) was investigated to assess the viability of a non-invasive approach for microplastic analyses in Antarctic penguins. A total of 80 penguin scats were collected and any microplastics they contained were extracted. A total of 20% of penguin scats from both islands contained microplastics, consisting mainly of fibers and fragments with different sizes and polymer composition (mean abundance of microplastics: 0.23 ± 0.53 items individual

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsAntarctic RegionsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMicroplasticsSpheniscidaeWater Pollutants, ChemicalMicroplasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID31578393
PMCPMC6775258
OpenAlexW2977273424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.