Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578350›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Cellular reprogramming for successful CNS axon regeneration is driven by a temporally changing cast of transcription factors.

Sumona P Dhara, Andrea Rau, Michael J Flister, Nicole M Recka, Michael D Laiosa, Paul L Auer, Ava J Udvadia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Serotonin neuromodulation directs optic nerve regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Nuclei Sequencing Reveals a Robust Corticospinal Response to Nearby Axotomy But Overall Insensitivity to Spinal Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Injury distance limits the transcriptional response to spinal injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sumona P DharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Andrea RauGABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Universite Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Michael J FlisterDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Nicole M ReckaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Michael D LaiosaJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Paul L AuerJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Ava J UdvadiaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. audvadia@uwm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-252X
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USAgroParisTech · FRMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to mammals, adult fish display a remarkable ability to fully regenerate central nervous system (CNS) axons, enabling functional recovery from CNS injury. Both fish and mammals normally undergo a developmental downregulation of axon growth activity as neurons mature. Fish are able to undergo damage-induced "reprogramming" through re-expression of genes necessary for axon growth and guidance, however, the gene regulatory mechanisms remain unknown. Here we present the first comprehensive analysis of gene regulatory reprogramming in zebrafish retinal ganglion cells at specific time points along the axon regeneration continuum from early growth to target re-innervation. Our analyses reveal a regeneration program characterized by sequential activation of stage-specific pathways, regulated by a temporally changing cast of transcription factors that bind to stably accessible DNA regulatory regions. Strikingly, we also find a discrete set of regulatory regions that change in accessibility, consistent with higher-order changes in chromatin organization that mark (1) the beginning of regenerative axon growth in the optic nerve, and (2) the re-establishment of synaptic connections in the brain. Together, these data provide valuable insight into the regulatory logic driving successful vertebrate CNS axon regeneration, revealing key gene regulatory candidates for therapeutic development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCellular ReprogrammingCentral Nervous SystemHumansNerve RegenerationOptic NerveOptic Nerve InjuriesRecovery of FunctionRetinal Ganglion CellsTranscription FactorsZebrafishTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31578350
PMCPMC6775158
OpenAlexW2978172756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.