Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Use of Natural Language Processing to identify Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder.

David Chandran, Deborah Ahn Robbins, Chin-Kuo Chang, Hitesh Shetty, Jyoti Sanyal, Johnny Downs, Marcella Fok, Michael Ball, Richard Jackson, Robert Stewart and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David ChandranKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom. david.chandran@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0123-666X
Deborah Ahn RobbinsKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Chin-Kuo ChangUniversity of Taipei, Department of Health and Welfare, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-7196
Hitesh ShettySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jyoti SanyalSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Johnny DownsKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-295X
Marcella FokKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Michael BallKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Richard JacksonKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Robert StewartKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah CohenKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Jentien M VermeulenUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederike SchirmbeckUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard HayesKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health CS-2018-18-ST2-014Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214Medical Research Council MR/J01219X/1Medical Research Council MR/L017105/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive and Compulsive Symptoms (OCS) or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in the context of schizophrenia or related disorders are of clinical importance as these are associated with a range of adverse outcomes. Natural Language Processing (NLP) applied to Electronic Health Records (EHRs) presents an opportunity to create large datasets to facilitate research in this area. This is a challenging endeavour however, because of the wide range of ways in which these symptoms are recorded, and the overlap of terms used to describe OCS with those used to describe other conditions. We developed an NLP algorithm to extract OCS information from a large mental healthcare EHR data resource at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust using its Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) facility. We extracted documents from individuals who had received a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. These text documents, annotated by human coders, were used for developing and refining the NLP algorithm (600 documents) with an additional set reserved for final validation (300 documents). The developed NLP algorithm utilized a rules-based approach to identify each of symptoms associated with OCS, and then combined them to determine the overall number of instances of OCS. After its implementation, the algorithm was shown to identify OCS with a precision and recall (with 95% confidence intervals) of 0.77 (0.65-0.86) and 0.67 (0.55-0.77) respectively. The development of this application demonstrated the potential to extract complex symptomatic data from mental healthcare EHRs using NLP to facilitate further analyses of these clinical symptoms and their relevance for prognosis and intervention response.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedNatural Language ProcessingAdultBipolar DisorderClinical CodingComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychotic DisordersSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31578348
PMCPMC6775052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.