ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Mapping low-affinity/high-specificity peptide-protein interactions using ligand-footprinting mass spectrometry.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peptides as programmable molecular scaffolds: from chemical synthesis and engineering to translational medicine.RSC chemical biology · 2026Review
- Targeted inhibition of M2 macrophages polarization via a PDC attenuates chronic pancreatitis through the PPARα pathway.iScience · 2026Article
- An ensemble-based model comprising deep learning for predicting peptide-binding residues in proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Chemical proteomic mapping of reversible small molecule binding sites in native systems.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024Review
- LiF-MS+, a revised technique for mapping peptide-protein interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mapping Peptide-Protein Interactions by Amine-Reactive Cleavable Photoaffinity Reagents.ACS omega · 2023Article
- ADAMTS4-specific MR probe to assess aortic aneurysms in vivo using synthetic peptide libraries.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Is There a Need for a More Precise Description of Biomolecule Interactions to Understand Cell Function?Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Interfacial Peptides as Affinity Modulating Agents of Protein-Protein Interactions.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Towards rational computational peptide design.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Design of Protein Segments and Peptides for Binding to Protein Targets.Biodesign research · 2022Review
- Fenton-Chemistry-Based Oxidative Modification of Proteins Reflects Their Conformation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- On the specificity of protein-protein interactions in the context of disorder.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Structural Proteomics Methods to Interrogate the Conformations and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- From prioritisation to understanding: mechanistic predictions of variant effects.Molecular systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Short linear peptide motifs that are intracellular ligands of folded proteins are a modular, incompletely understood molecular interaction language in signaling systems. Such motifs, which frequently occur in intrinsically disordered protein regions, often bind partner proteins with modest affinity and are difficult to study with conventional structural biology methods. We developed LiF-MS (ligand-footprinting mass spectrometry), a method to map peptide binding sites on folded protein domains that allows consideration of their dynamic disorder, and used it to analyze a set of D-motif peptide-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) associations to validate the approach and define unknown binding structures. LiF-MS peptide ligands carry a short-lived, indiscriminately reactive cleavable crosslinker that marks contacts close to ligand binding sites with high specificity. Each marked amino acid provides an independent constraint for a set of directed peptide-protein docking simulations, which are analyzed by agglomerative hierarchical clustering. We found that LiF-MS provides accurate ab initio identification of ligand binding surfaces and a view of potential binding ensembles of a set of D-motif peptide-MAPK associations. Our analysis provides an MKK4-JNK1 structural model, which has thus far been crystallographically unattainable, a potential alternate binding mode for part of the NFAT4-JNK interaction, and evidence of bidirectional association of MKK4 peptide with ERK2. Overall, we find that LiF-MS is an effective noncrystallographic way to understand how short linear motifs associate with specific sites on folded protein domains at the level of individual amino acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.