Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578190›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2019

Can laboratory model systems instruct human limb regeneration?

Ben D Cox, Maximina H Yun, Kenneth D Poss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular evolution of animal aging.The EMBO journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evi5 is required forFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunity in salamander regeneration: Where are we standing and where are we headed?Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  9. Salamander Insights Into Ageing and Rejuvenation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben D CoxRegeneration Next, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Maximina H YunTechnische Universität Dresden, CRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany maximina.yun@tu-dresden.de kenneth.poss@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9019-2453
Kenneth D PossRegeneration Next, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA maximina.yun@tu-dresden.de kenneth.poss@duke.edu.
Duke University · USMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DE

Funding

Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration has fascinated scientists since well before the 20th century revolutions in genetics and molecular biology. The field of regenerative biology has grown steadily over the past decade, incorporating advances in imaging, genomics and genome editing to identify key cell types and molecules involved across many model organisms. Yet for many or most tissues, it can be difficult to predict when and how findings from these studies will advance regenerative medicine. Establishing technologies to stimulate regrowth of a lost or amputated limb with a patterned replicate, as salamanders do routinely, is one of the most challenging directives of tissue regeneration research. Here, we speculate upon what research avenues the field must explore to move closer to this capstone achievement.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RegenerationCaudataEpigenomicsExtremitiesHumansModels, BiologicalRegenerationRegenerative MedicineWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID31578190
PMCPMC6917474
OpenAlexW2978975217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.