Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578155›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

A comparative assessment of adult mosquito trapping methods to estimate spatial patterns of abundance and community composition in southern Africa.

Erin E Gorsich, Brianna R Beechler, Peter M van Bodegom, Danny Govender, Milehna M Guarido, Marietjie Venter, Maarten Schrama

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effective population size ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The MosHouseInsects · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Erin E GorsichInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. erin.gorsich@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-0540
Brianna R BeechlerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Peter M van BodegomInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Danny GovenderSANPARKS, Scientific Services, Skukuza, South Africa.
Milehna M GuaridoZoonotic Arbo- and Respiratory Virus Program, Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Marietjie VenterZoonotic Arbo- and Respiratory Virus Program, Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Maarten SchramaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Pretoria · ZAOregon State University · USScientific Services · ZA

Funding

Gratama Fund, University of Leiden 2016.08Uyttenboogaart-Eliasen SUB.2016.12.08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing adult mosquito populations is an important component of disease surveillance programs and ecosystem health assessments. Inference from adult trapping datasets involves comparing populations across space and time, but comparisons based on different trapping methods may be biased if traps have different efficiencies or sample different subsets of the mosquito community.

methodsWe compared four widely-used trapping methods for adult mosquito data collection in Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa: Centers for Disease Control miniature light trap (CDC), Biogents Sentinel trap (BG), Biogents gravid Aedes trap (GAT) and a net trap. We quantified how trap choice and sampling effort influence inferences on the regional distribution of mosquito abundance, richness and community composition.

resultsThe CDC and net traps together collected 96% (47% and 49% individually) of the 955 female mosquitoes sampled and 100% (85% and 78% individually) of the 40 species or species complexes identified. The CDC and net trap also identified similar regional patterns of community composition. However, inference on the regional patterns of abundance differed between these traps because mosquito abundance in the net trap was influenced by variation in weather conditions. The BG and GAT traps collected significantly fewer mosquitoes, limiting regional comparisons of abundance and community composition.

conclusionsThis study represents the first systematic assessment of trapping methods in natural savanna ecosystems in southern Africa. We recommend the CDC trap or the net trap for future monitoring and surveillance programs.

Indexed as

BiodiversityPopulation DensityAnimalsCulicidaeEntomologySouth AfricaSpatial AnalysisArbovirusesCommunity compositionKruger National ParkMosquitoSouth AfricaTrap biasVector

Identifiers

PMID31578155
PMCPMC6775653
OpenAlexW2977256686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.