Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578145›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019

Limitation of treatment in prehospital care - the experiences of helicopter emergency medical service physicians in a nationwide multicentre survey.

Heidi Kangasniemi, Piritta Setälä, Heini Huhtala, Antti Kämäräinen, Ilkka Virkkunen, Joonas Tirkkonen, Arvi Yli-Hankala, Sanna Hoppu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heidi KangasniemiResearch and Development Unit, FinnHEMS Ltd, WTC Helsinki Airport, Lentäjäntie 3, 01530, Vantaa, Finland. Heidi.kangasniemi@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-5269
Piritta SetäläEmergency Medical Services, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.
Heini HuhtalaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.
Antti KämäräinenEmergency Medical Services, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.
Ilkka VirkkunenResearch and Development Unit, FinnHEMS Ltd, WTC Helsinki Airport, Lentäjäntie 3, 01530, Vantaa, Finland.
Joonas TirkkonenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.
Arvi Yli-HankalaFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere University, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.
Sanna HoppuEmergency Medical Services, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

FinnHEMS Research and development unit Scientific grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaking ethically sound treatment limitations in prehospital care is a complex topic. Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physicians were surveyed on their experiences with limitations of care orders in the prehospital setting, including situations where they are dispatched to healthcare facilities or nursing homes.

methodsA nationwide multicentre study was conducted among all HEMS physicians in Finland in 2017 using a questionnaire with closed five-point Likert-scale questions and open questions. The Ethics Committee of the Tampere University Hospital approved the study protocol (R15048).

resultsFifty-nine (88%) physicians responded. Their median age was 43 (IQR 38-47) and median medical working experience was 15 (IQR 10-20) years. All respondents made limitation of care orders and 39% made them often. Three fourths (75%) of the physicians were often dispatched to healthcare facilities and nursing homes and the majority (93%) regularly met patients who should have already had a valid limitation of care order. Every other physician (49%) had sometimes decided not to implement a medically justifiable limitation of care order because they wanted to avoid conflicts with the patient and/or the next of kin and/or other healthcare staff. Limitation of care order practices varied between the respondents, but neither age nor working experience explained these differences in answers. Most physicians (85%) stated that limitations of care orders are part of their work and 81% did not find them especially burdensome. The most challenging patient groups for treatment limitations were the under-aged patients, the severely disabled patients and the patients in healthcare facilities or residing in nursing homes.

conclusionMaking limitation of care orders is an important but often invisible part of a HEMS physician's work. HEMS physicians expressed that patients in long-term care were often without limitations of care orders in situations where an order would have been ethically in accordance with the patient's best interests.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesAircraftSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansDecision-makingDNAREmergency medical servicesEthicsNursing homeTreatment limitations

Identifiers

PMID31578145
PMCPMC6775669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.