Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31578141›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2019

The VENUSS prognostic model to predict disease recurrence following surgery for non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: development and evaluation using the ASSURE prospective clinical trial cohort.

Tobias Klatte, Kevin M Gallagher, Luca Afferi, Alessandro Volpe, Nils Kroeger, Silvia Ribback, Alan McNeill, Antony C P Riddick, James N Armitage, Tevita F 'Aho and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic models in papillary renal cell carcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Tobias KlatteDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. tobias.klatte@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4392-6861
Kevin M GallagherDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Luca AfferiDivision of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Alessandro VolpeDivision of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Nils KroegerDepartment of Urology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.
Silvia RibbackInstitute of Pathology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.
Alan McNeillDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Antony C P RiddickDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
James N ArmitageDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Tevita F 'AhoDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Tim EisenDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Kate FifeDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Axel BexDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Allan J PantuckInstitute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Grant D StewartDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBWestern General Hospital · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N002210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery.

methodsWe studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups.

resultsWe developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups.

conclusionsWe developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisAdjuvantLocalisedPapillaryPrognosisRecurrenceSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31578141
PMCPMC6775651
OpenAlexW2978156688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.