ArticlePediatric research2020
Privacy-protecting multivariable-adjusted distributed regression analysis for multi-center pediatric study.
Article in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crossing borders securely: synthetic data and federated networks for privacy-preserving access to real-world data and emerging use cases.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Privacy-preserving estimation of an optimal individualized treatment rule: a case study in maximizing time to severe depression-related outcomes.Lifetime data analysis · 2022Article
- Review of Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020Review
- Privacy-preserving statistical analyses in Learning Health Systems.Pediatric research · 2020Article
- Analytic and Data Sharing Options in Real-World Multidatabase Studies of Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Medical Products.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrivacy-protecting analytic approaches without centralized pooling of individual-level data, such as distributed regression, are particularly important for vulnerable populations, such as children, but these methods have not yet been tested in multi-center pediatric studies.
methodsUsing the electronic health data from 34 healthcare institutions in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), we fit 12 multivariable-adjusted linear regression models to assess the associations of antibiotic use <24 months of age with body mass index z-score at 48 to <72 months of age. We ran these models using pooled individual-level data and conventional multivariable-adjusted regression (reference method), as well as using the more privacy-protecting pooled summary-level intermediate statistics and distributed regression technique. We compared the results from these two methods.
resultsPooled individual-level and distributed linear regression analyses produced virtually identical parameter estimates and standard errors. Across all 12 models, the maximum difference in any of the parameter estimates or standard errors was 4.4833 × 10
conclusionsWe demonstrated empirically the feasibility and validity of distributed linear regression analysis using only summary-level information within a large multi-center study of children. This approach could enable expanded opportunities for multi-center pediatric research, especially when sharing of granular individual-level data is challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.