Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31577796›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Microliths in the South Asian rainforest ~45-4 ka: New insights from Fa-Hien Lena Cave, Sri Lanka.

Oshan Wedage, Andrea Picin, James Blinkhorn, Katerina Douka, Siran Deraniyagala, Nikos Kourampas, Nimal Perera, Ian Simpson, Nicole Boivin, Michael Petraglia and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
57.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Oshan WedageDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Andrea PicinDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
James BlinkhornDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Katerina DoukaDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Siran DeraniyagalaDepartment of Archaeology, Government of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Nikos KourampasBiological and Environmental Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Nimal PereraDepartment of Archaeology, Government of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ian SimpsonBiological and Environmental Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-7877
Nicole BoivinDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Michael PetragliaDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Patrick RobertsDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4403-7548
Department of Archaeology · LKSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity of Stirling · GBMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DERoyal Holloway University of London · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sri Jayewardenepura · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microliths-small, retouched, often-backed stone tools-are often interpreted to be the product of composite tools, including projectile weapons, and efficient hunting strategies by modern humans. In Europe and Africa these lithic toolkits are linked to hunting of medium- and large-sized game found in grassland or woodland settings, or as adaptations to risky environments during periods of climatic change. Here, we report on a recently excavated lithic assemblage from the Late Pleistocene cave site of Fa-Hien Lena in the tropical evergreen rainforest of Sri Lanka. Our analyses demonstrate that Fa-Hien Lena represents the earliest microlith assemblage in South Asia (c. 48,000-45,000 cal. years BP) in firm association with evidence for the procurement of small to medium size arboreal prey and rainforest plants. Moreover, our data highlight that the lithic technology of Fa-Hien Lena changed little over the long span of human occupation (c. 48,000-45,000 cal. years BP to c. 4,000 cal. years BP) indicating a successful, stable technological adaptation to the tropics. We argue that microlith assemblages were an important part of the environmental plasticity that enabled Homo sapiens to colonise and specialise in a diversity of ecological settings during its expansion within and beyond Africa. The proliferation of diverse microlithic technologies across Eurasia c. 48-45 ka was part of a flexible human 'toolkit' that assisted our species' spread into all of the world's environments, and the development of specialised technological and cultural approaches to novel ecological situations.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyCavesRainforestTool Use BehaviorArtifactsAsiaCalibrationGeographyHumansRadiometric DatingSri LankaTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31577796
PMCPMC6774521
OpenAlexW2977651776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.