Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31577632›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Ingested Nitrate and Nitrite and Bladder Cancer in Northern New England.

Kathryn Hughes Barry, Rena R Jones, Kenneth P Cantor, Laura E Beane Freeman, David C Wheeler, Dalsu Baris, Alison T Johnson, G Monawar Hosain, Molly Schwenn, Han Zhang and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. RASSF1A and its epigenetic dysregulation in genitourinary cancer: a current update.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. US drinking water quality: exposure risk profiles for seven legacy and emerging contaminants.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn Hughes BarryFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Rena R JonesFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Kenneth P CantorFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Laura E Beane FreemanFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
David C WheelerDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Dalsu BarisFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Alison T JohnsonVermont Department of Health, Burlington, VT.
G Monawar HosainBureau of Public Health Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, NH.
Molly SchwennMaine Cancer Registry, Augusta, ME.
Han ZhangBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Rashmi SinhaMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Stella KoutrosFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Margaret R KaragasDepartment of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Debra T SilvermanFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Mary H WardFrom the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Institute · USDartmouth College · USVermont Department of Health · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Cancer Risk and Environmental ExposuresZIACP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$41.3M
Epigenomic and transcriptomic markers of aggressive prostate cancer among African American menK07CA230182 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BARRY, KATHRYN HUGHES · 2018 to 2023
$827k
INVESTIGATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES AND CANCERZ01CP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CANTOR, KENNETH · 1996 to 2008
$108k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010125NCI NIH HHS K07 CA230182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundN-nitroso compounds are hypothesized human bladder carcinogens. We investigated ingestion of N-nitroso compound precursors nitrate and nitrite from drinking water and diet and bladder cancer in the New England Bladder Cancer Study.

methodsUsing historical nitrate measurements for public water supplies and measured and modeled values for private wells, as well as self-reported water intake, we estimated average nitrate concentrations (mg/L NO3-N) and average daily nitrate intake (mg/d) from 1970 to diagnosis/reference date (987 cases and 1,180 controls). We estimated overall and source-specific dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes using a food frequency questionnaire (1,037 cases and 1,225 controls). We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated interactions with factors that may affect N-nitroso compound formation (i.e., red meat, vitamin C, smoking), and with water intake.

resultsAverage drinking water nitrate concentration above the 95th percentile (>2.07 mg/L) compared with the lowest quartile (≤0.21 mg/L) was associated with bladder cancer (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.97, 2.3; P trend = 0.01); the association was similar for average daily drinking water nitrate intake. We observed positive associations for dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes from processed meat (highest versus lowest quintile OR for nitrate = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.0; P trend = 0.04; OR for nitrite = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.1; P trend = 0.04, respectively), but not other dietary sources. We observed positive interactions between drinking water nitrate and red meat (P-interaction 0.05) and processed red meat (0.07).

conclusionsOur results suggest the importance of both drinking water and dietary nitrate sources as risk factors for bladder cancer.

Indexed as

DietDrinking WaterNitratesNitritesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew EnglandRed MeatRisk FactorsDrinking WaterNitratesNitrites

Identifiers

PMID31577632
PMCPMC6927574
OpenAlexW2979003614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.