Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31577256›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2019

Combined use of medically-assisted reproductive techniques: a new bioethical issue.

Matteo Bertelli, Stefano Paolacci, Giorgio Placidi, Gino Scaccia, Pietro Chiurazzi, Ezio Fulcheri, Daniele Malacarne, Boleslav Lichterman, Paolo Petralia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Dietary supplements for polycystic ovary syndrome.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matteo BertelliMAGI Euregio, Bolzano, Italy. matteo.bertelli@assomagi.org.
Stefano Paolacci
Giorgio Placidi
Gino Scaccia
Pietro Chiurazzi
Ezio Fulcheri
Daniele Malacarne
Boleslav Lichterman
Paolo Petralia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe studies of Nobel laureate Robert Geoffrey Edwards led to the first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in 1978. Since then, reproductive medicine has made huge advances. Methods available to sterile couples now include: purchasing oocytes and sperm, uterus surrogacy, pre-implantation or pre-natal diagnosis, embryo/fetal selection. Here we highlight the fact that combinations of existing technologies could threaten the non-marketability of human life.

methodsWe searched PubMed and websites to find articles regarding assisted reproduction techniques.

resultsThese methods, taken separately, provide support for natural fertilization, but when used together, they may lead to genuine "baby factories". In poor countries, such "factories" exist and often act illegally.

conclusionsWe highlight the need for deeper bioethical studies and better legislation regarding the combined use of medically-assisted reproductive techniques.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesFemaleHumansMaleReproductive MedicineReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31577256
PMCPMC7233638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.