Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31577177›Full record

Trial reportPsychological science2019

Increasing Vegetable Intake by Emphasizing Tasty and Enjoyable Attributes: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Intervention for Taste-Focused Labeling.

Bradley P Turnwald, Jaclyn D Bertoldo, Margaret A Perry, Peggy Policastro, Maureen Timmons, Christopher Bosso, Priscilla Connors, Robert T Valgenti, Lindsey Pine, Ghislaine Challamel and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The meatball matchup: Plant vs. animal proteins on campus.Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Key action areas for transforming the UK food system: insights from the Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Programme project portfolio.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bradley P TurnwaldDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-8932
Jaclyn D BertoldoResidential and Dining Enterprises, Stanford University.
Margaret A PerryDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Peggy PolicastroInstitute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, Rutgers University.
Maureen TimmonsDining Services, Northeastern University.
Christopher BossoSchool of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University.
Priscilla ConnorsDepartment of Hospitality and Tourism Management, University of North Texas.
Robert T ValgentiDepartment of Philosophy, Lebanon Valley College.
Lindsey PineUSC Hospitality, University of Southern California.
Ghislaine ChallamelMenus of Change University Research Collaborative.
Christopher D GardnerStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University.
Alia J CrumDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Harnessing Mindset in 21st Century HealthcareDP2AT009511 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CRUM, ALIA · 2016 to 2016
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NCCIH NIH HHS DP2 AT009511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy food labels tout health benefits, yet most people prioritize tastiness in the moment of food choice. In a preregistered intervention, we tested whether taste-focused labels compared with health-focused labels increased vegetable intake at five university dining halls throughout the United States. Across 137,842 diner decisions, 185 days, and 24 vegetable types, taste-focused labels increased vegetable selection by 29% compared with health-focused labels and by 14% compared with basic labels. Vegetable consumption also increased. Supplementary studies further probed the mediators, moderators, and boundaries of these effects. Increased expectations of a positive taste experience mediated the effect of taste-focused labels on vegetable selection. Moderation tests revealed greater effects in settings that served tastier vegetable recipes. Taste-focused labels outperformed labels that merely contained positive words, fancy words, or lists of ingredients. Together, these studies show that emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes increases vegetable intake in real-world settings in which vegetables compete with less healthy options.

Indexed as

Food LabelingTasteVegetablesChoice BehaviorDiet, HealthyFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleUnited StatesUniversitieshealthinterventionlabelnutritionobesityopen datapreregisteredvegetable

Identifiers

PMID31577177
PMCPMC6843749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.