Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576946›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2019

User satisfaction in the spanish health system: trend analysis.

Víctor Pérez-Cantó, Loreto Maciá-Soler, Víctor M González-Chordá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Health Investment Management and Healthcare Quality in the Public System: A Gender Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Víctor Pérez-CantóUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería. Alicante, AL, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-6359
Loreto Maciá-SolerUnivesidad de Alicante. Unidad Científica de Innovación Empresarial "Ars Innovatio". Alicante, AL, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-7607
Víctor M González-ChordáUniversitat Jaume I. Departamento de Enfermería. Castellón, CS, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2214-5190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the trend of opinion and satisfaction indicators of the Spanish national health system from 2005 to 2017.

methodsEcological study of time series analyzing the trend of eight indicators of opinion and satisfaction on the Spanish national health system and its autonomous communities from 2005 to 2017. The data was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality and from the Health Barometer. The Prais-Winsten regression method was used.

resultsA static tendency was observed in the perception of users on how the health system works (APC = 1.898, 95%CI -0.954 - 4.751) and decreasing opinion on the improvement of primary care (APC = -0.283; 95%CI -0.335 - -0.121), specialized (APC = -0.241, 95%CI -0.74 - -0.109) and hospitalization (APC = -0.171, 95%CI -0.307 - -0.036). Satisfaction with knowledge and follow-up by the family doctor and pediatrician showed an increasing trend (APC = 7.939, 95%CI 3.965 - 11.914). Satisfaction with medical and nursing professionals was static. No large differences were observed in the trends of the indicators studied in the autonomous communities.

conclusionsA negative trend was observed in the opinion of the Spanish national health system users. Financing, human resources, quality management systems and differences in the autonomous communities may be some of the causes.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHumansNational Health ProgramsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareReference ValuesRegression AnalysisSpainTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31576946
PMCPMC6763284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.