Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576945›Full record

ReviewRevista de saude publica2019

Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation.

Zafiro Andrade-Romo, Ileana B Heredia-Pi, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal, Lourdes Bravo Bolaños Cacho, Laurie Jurkiewicz, Blair G Darney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de saude publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Group Antenatal Care: A Paradigm Shift to Explore for Positive Impacts in Resource-poor Settings.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zafiro Andrade-RomoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-9469
Ileana B Heredia-PiInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-9239
Evelyn Fuentes-RiveraInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-6133
Jacqueline Alcalde-RabanalInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9172-2302
Lourdes Bravo Bolaños CachoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-2373
Laurie JurkiewiczUniversity of California San Francisco. San Francisco General Hospital. Department of ObGyn & Reproductive Sciences. San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-7689
Blair G DarneyOregon Health & Science University. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-028X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group prenatal care is an alternative model of care during pregnancy, replacing standard individual prenatal care. The model has shown maternal benefits and has been implemented in different contexts. We conducted a narrative review of the literature in relation to its effectiveness, using databases such as PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, Wiley Online and Springer for the period 2002 to 2018. In addition, we discussed the challenges and solutions of its implementation based on our experience in Mexico. Group prenatal care may improve prenatal knowledge and use of family planning services in the postpartum period. The model has been implemented in more than 22 countries and there are challenges to its implementation related to both supply and demand. Supply-side challenges include staff, material resources and organizational issues; demand-side challenges include recruitment and retention of participants, adaptation of material, and perceived privacy. We highlight specific solutions that can be applied in diverse health systems.

Indexed as

Group StructureFemaleHumansMexicoModels, OrganizationalPregnancyPrenatal CareReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31576945
PMCPMC6763281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.