Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576786›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2020

The development and validation of an algorithm to predict future depression onset in unselected youth.

Joseph R Cohen, Hena Thakur, Jami F Young, Benjamin L Hankin

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is ACEs Screening for Adolescent Mental Health Accurate and Fair?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph R CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, ILUSA.
Hena ThakurDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, ILUSA.
Jami F YoungDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PAUSA.
Benjamin L HankinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, ILUSA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Genetic cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression in youthR01MH077178 · NIMH · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI YOUNG, JAMI F · 2007 to 2017
$3.6M
Genetic cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression in youthR01MH077195 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2007 to 2017
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077178NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal depression screening in youth typically focuses on strategies for identifying current distress and impairment. However, these protocols also play a critical role in primary prevention initiatives that depend on correctly estimating future depression risk. Thus, the present study aimed to identify the best screening approach for predicting depression onset in youth.

methodsTwo multi-wave longitudinal studies (N = 591, AgeM = 11.74; N = 348, AgeM = 12.56) were used as the 'test' and 'validation' datasets among youth who did not present with a history of clinical depression. Youth and caregivers completed inventories for depressive symptoms, adversity exposure (including maternal depression), social/academic impairment, cognitive vulnerabilities (rumination, dysfunctional attitudes, and negative cognitive style), and emotional predispositions (negative and positive affect) at baseline. Subsequently, multi-informant diagnostic interviews were completed every 6 months for 2 years.

resultsSelf-reported rumination, social/academic impairment, and negative affect best predicted first depression onsets in youth across both samples. Self- and parent-reported depressive symptoms did not consistently predict depression onset after controlling for other predictors. Youth with high scores on the three inventories were approximately twice as likely to experience a future first depressive episode compared to the sample average. Results suggested that one's likelihood of developing depression could be estimated based on subthreshold and threshold risk scores.

conclusionsMost pediatric depression screening protocols assess current manifestations of depressive symptoms. Screening for prospective first onsets of depressive episodes can be better accomplished via an algorithm incorporating rumination, negative affect, and impairment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentCaregiversChildDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSelf ReportAssessmentpediatric depressionreceiver operating characteristicsscreening

Identifiers

PMID31576786
PMCPMC12883198
OpenAlexW2977589706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.