Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576497›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2020

Assessment of depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and eating psychopathology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 1-year follow-up and comparison with healthy controls.

Saliha Çalışır, Akın Çalışır, Mehmet Arslan, İkbal İnanlı, Ali Metehan Çalışkan, İbrahim Eren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Depressive symptoms at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up after bariatric surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Early Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Brain Functionality.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saliha ÇalışırDepartment of Psychiatry, Konya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
Akın ÇalışırDepartment of General Surgery, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.
Mehmet ArslanDepartment of Psychiatry, Babaeski State Hospital, 39200, Kırklareli, Turkey. drmehmetarslan@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-253X
İkbal İnanlıDepartment of Psychiatry, Konya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
Ali Metehan ÇalışkanDepartment of Psychiatry, Konya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
İbrahim ErenDepartment of Psychiatry, Konya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
Konya Food and Agriculture University · TRSelçuk University · TRState Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and eating psychopathology in bariatric surgery patients at the preoperative period (t0) and at the 6-month (t1) and 12-month (t2) follow-ups after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A second aim was to investigate associations between these variables and weight loss.

methodThe study participants were 48 bariatric surgery candidates and 50 non-obese controls. Both groups underwent assessment with the Sociodemographic Data Form, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), and Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES). These assessments were repeated for the patient group at t1 and t2.

resultsThe HDRS, RSES, and EDE-Q scores were higher in the patients before LSG (t0) than in the control group. A significant progressive improvement was identified in the patient HDRS and RSES scores as well as EDE-Q weight and shape subscale scores at t1 and t2. However, the patient EDE-Q total and dietary restraint scores improved at t1 then stabilized. The patient EDE-Q eating concern subscale improved at t1, but then worsened. The patient HDRS scores at t2 were similar to the control group, but the EDE-Q and RSES scores were still higher than the control scores at t2. Regression analyses revealed no association between the preoperative scores and percent changes in postoperative scores for any scale and patient weight loss at t2.

conclusionDepressive symptoms, self-esteem, and eating psychopathology showed an improving trend in patients after LSG. However, some aspects of eating psychopathology worsened despite an initial improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective cohort and case-control study.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersLaparoscopyMental DisordersCase-Control StudiesDepressionFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesDepressionEating disorderLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyObesitySelf-esteemWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID31576497
OpenAlexW2978947113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.