ArticleNeurocritical care2020
Cyclosporine A Plus Ischemic Postconditioning Improves Neurological Function in Rats After Cardiac Resuscitation.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The unmet promise: a critical review of antioxidant strategies in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the path towards precision medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial transplantation following cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves neurological function in rats by inducing M2-type MG/MΦ polarization.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Prostaglandin E1 attenuates post‑cardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction through inhibition of mitochondria‑mediated cardiomyocyte apoptosis.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAttenuation of neuronal apoptosis helps maintain neurological function in patients after cardiac arrest. After ischemia-reperfusion, both cyclosporin A (CsA) and ischemic postconditioning independently protect mitochondria and thus reduce nerve injury. This study employed a rat model to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of combining ischemic postconditioning with CsA after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
methodsRats were apportioned equally to model control, postconditioned, CsA-treated, or CsA + postconditioned groups. Asphyxial cardiac arrest was imposed using modified Utstein-style guidelines. In the appropriate groups, postconditioning was implemented by ischemia and reperfusion (clamping and loosening the left femoral artery); CsA treatment was delivered with a single intravenous dose. Neurological deficits were scored at different times after CPR. Histological evaluation and electron microscopy were used to evaluate tissue damage, and TUNEL and flow cytometry were used to measure the apoptotic rate of hippocampal neurons and size of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening.
resultsThe apoptotic rate was significantly lower in the postconditioned and CsA-treated groups compared with the model control and lowest in the CsA + postconditioned group. By histological evaluation and electron microscopy, the least damage was observed in the CsA + postconditioned group. The neurological deficit score of the CsA + postconditioned group was significantly higher than that of the CsA-treated group, but the size of the mPTP openings of these two groups was comparable.
conclusionIschemic postconditioning combined with CsA exerted a better neuroprotective effect after CPR than did either postconditioning or CsA alone. Inhibiting the opening of the mPTP is not the only neuroprotective mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.