ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2020
Investigation of solid tumor progression with account of proliferation/migration dichotomy via Darwinian mathematical model.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- LARS promotes osteosarcoma proliferation through leucine-dependent PRIM2 translation and DNA replication activation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- DACT1 inhibits cuproptosis and promotes cell malignancy via activation of PI3K/AKT signaling in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Go-or-grow models in biology: a monster on a leash.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Review
- Cell Migration-Proliferation Dichotomy in Cancer: Biological Fact or Experimental Artefact?Biology · 2024Article
- Article
- EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- FtH-Mediated ROS Dysregulation Promotes CXCL12/CXCR4 Axis Activation and EMT-Like Trans-Differentiation in Erythroleukemia K562 Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new continuous spatially-distributed model of solid tumor growth and progression is presented. The model explicitly accounts for mutations/epimutations of tumor cells which take place upon their division. The tumor grows in normal tissue and its progression is driven only by competition between populations of malignant cells for limited nutrient supply. Two reasons for the motion of tumor cells in space are taken into consideration, i.e., their intrinsic motility and convective fluxes, which arise due to proliferation of tumor cells. The model is applied to investigation of solid tumor progression under phenotypic alterations that inversely affect cell proliferation rate and cell motility by increasing the value of one of the parameters at the expense of another.It is demonstrated that the crucial feature that gives evolutionary advantage to a cell population is the speed of its intergrowth into surrounding normal tissue. Of note, increase in tumor intergrowth speed in not always associated with increase in motility of tumor cells. Depending on the parameters of functions, that describe phenotypic alterations, tumor cellular composition may evolve towards: (1) maximization of cell proliferation rate, (2) maximization of cell motility, (3) non-extremum values of cell proliferation rate and motility. Scenarios are found, where after initial tendency for maximization of cell proliferation rate, the direction of tumor progression sharply switches to maximization of cell motility, which is accompanied by decrease in total speed of tumor growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31576418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.