ArticleJournal of cognition2019
Conducting Web-Based Experiments for Numerical Cognition Research.
Article in Journal of cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introducing GABLE: Lightweight infrastructure for longitudinal experiments using Google Apps Script.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Concepts of order: Why is ordinality processed slower and less accurately for non-consecutive sequences?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Creating web applications for online psychological experiments: A hands-on technical guide including a template.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Words before pictures: the role of language in biasing visual attention.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- From Lab-Testing to Web-Testing in Cognitive Research: Who You Test is More Important than how You Test.Journal of cognition · 2023Article
- Are explicit and implicit affective attitudes toward different body shape categories related to the own body-satisfaction in young women? The role of mindfulness, self-compassion and social media activity.Psychological research · 2022Article
- New Consumer Research Technology for Food Behaviour: Overview and Validity.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Processing symbolic magnitude information conveyed by number words and by scalar adjectives.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
- Running Online Behavioral Experiments Using R: Implementation of a Response-Time Decision Making Task as an R-Shiny App.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
- Children's Learning of Non-adjacent Dependencies Using a Web-Based Computer Game Setting.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Effects of Print Exposure on an Online Lexical Decision Task: A Direct Replication Using a Web-Based Experimental Procedure.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Individual Green-Washing Effect in E-Mobility: Emotional Evaluations of Electric and Gasoline Cars.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is becoming increasingly popular and straightforward to collect data in cognitive psychology through web-based studies. In this paper, I review issues around web-based data collection for the purpose of numerical cognition research. Provided that the desired type of data can be collected through a web-browser, such online studies offer numerous advantages over traditional forms of physical lab-based data collection, such as gathering data from larger sample sizes in shorter time-windows and easier access to non-local populations. I then present results of two replication studies that employ classical paradigms in numerical cognition research: the number-size congruity paradigm and comparison to a given standard, which also included a masked priming manipulation. In both replications, reaction times and error rates were comparable to original, physical lab-based studies. Consistent with the results of original studies, a distance effect, a congruity effect, and a priming effect were observed. Data collected online thus offers a level of reliability comparable to data collected in a physical lab when it comes to questions in numerical cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.