Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576375›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2019

Assessing Predictors of Early and Late Hospital Readmission After Kidney Transplantation.

Julien Hogan, Michael D Arenson, Sandesh M Adhikary, Kevin Li, Xingyu Zhang, Rebecca Zhang, Jeffrey N Valdez, Raymond J Lynch, Jimeng Sun, Andrew B Adams and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julien HoganDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Michael D ArensonDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Sandesh M AdhikaryCollege of computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Kevin LiDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Xingyu ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Rebecca ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
Jeffrey N ValdezCollege of computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Raymond J LynchDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Jimeng SunCollege of computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Andrew B AdamsDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Rachel E PatzerDepartment of Surgery, Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
J: NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002382 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Vasiliki Michopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Reducing Disparities among Kidney Transplant RecipientsR01MD011682 · NIMHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, ANDREW B, PATZER, RACHEL E · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002382NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA better understanding of the risk factors of posttransplant hospital readmission is needed to develop accurate predictive models.

methodsWe included 40 461 kidney transplant recipients from United States renal data system (USRDS) between 2005 and 2014. We used Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total time model to compare the importance of various risk factors in predicting posttransplant readmission based on the number of the readmissions (first vs subsequent) and a random forest model to compare risk factors based on the timing of readmission (early vs late).

resultsTwelve thousand nine hundred eighty-five (31.8%) and 25 444 (62.9%) were readmitted within 30 days and 1 year postdischarge, respectively. Fifteen thousand eight hundred (39.0%) had multiple readmissions. Predictive accuracies of our models ranged from 0.61 to 0.63. Transplant factors remained the main predictors for early and late readmission but decreased with time. Although recipients' demographics and socioeconomic factors only accounted for 2.5% and 11% of the prediction at 30 days, respectively, their contribution to the prediction of later readmission increased to 7% and 14%, respectively. Donor characteristics remained poor predictors at all times. The association between recipient characteristics and posttransplant readmission was consistent between the first and subsequent readmissions. Donor and transplant characteristics presented a stronger association with the first readmission compared with subsequent readmissions.

conclusionsThese results may inform the development of future predictive models of hospital readmission that could be used to identify kidney transplant recipients at high risk for posttransplant hospitalization and design interventions to prevent readmission.

Identifiers

PMID31576375
PMCPMC6708631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.