Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576170›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers predict early treatment response and favorable survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent first line cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Jinling Jiang, Tao Ma, Wenqi Xi, Chen Yang, Junwei Wu, Chenfei Zhou, Nan Wang, Zhenggang Zhu, Jun Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Systemic inflammation and prognosis in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving anti-EGFR therapy: A real-world cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinling JiangDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Tao MaDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Wenqi XiDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Chen YangDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Junwei WuDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Chenfei ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Nan WangDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Zhenggang ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was to determine whether peripheral blood biomarkers including neutrophil‑lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) could predict early response to cetuximab; moreover, the prognostic ability of those biomarkers on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with wild-type (WT) RAS was also investigated.

methodsmCRC patients with WT RAS treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed, and early response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 after three or four treatment cycles. In prior to chemotherapy, hematologic data and clinic-pathological parameters were collected. The associations between pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and early response, and the prognostic value of those biomarkers were analyzed. A total of 102 patients were enrolled and divided into low or high NLR, PLR, and SII groups, respectively.

resultsThe early response rate was significantly higher in the low NLR (

conclusionPre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers, especially NLR were predictors of benefit from cetuximab-combined therapy in mCRC patients. They were also predictors of significantly longer PFS and OS of early responders compared to non-responders.

Indexed as

cetuximabearly treatment responseinflammatory biomarkersmetastatic colorectal cancerwild-type RAS

Identifiers

PMID31576170
PMCPMC6767765
OpenAlexW2976716788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.