Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31576169›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Comparison of outcomes of complete mesocolic excision with conventional radical resection performed by laparoscopic approach for right colon cancer.

Manzhao Ouyang, Zhentao Luo, Jinhao Wu, Weijie Zhang, Shibin Tang, Yan Lu, Weixian Hu, Xueqing Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manzhao Ouyang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Zhentao Luo *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Jinhao Wu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Weijie ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Shibin TangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Yan LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528308, People's Republic of China.
Weixian HuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, People's Republic of China.
Xueqing YaoDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, People's Republic of China.
Southern Medical University · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNThe First People's Hospital of Shunde · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis retrospective study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) guided by superior mesenteric artery with laparoscopic conventional radical resection (CRR) performed for right-sided colon cancer.

methodsPatients with right-sided colon cancer underwent CME (n=107; January 2011 to December 2015) or CRR (n=60; January 2008 to December 2010).

resultsThe 2 groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor stage. In the CME group, the distances between the tumor and the high vascular tie (HVT; 12.6 cm), and between the closest bowel wall and HVT (10.4±0.9 cm) was significantly greater than that of the CRR group (11.5 cm and 9.3±1.0 cm, respectively;

conclusionCME for right-sided colon cancer guided by superior mesenteric artery has similar short-term outcomes, higher lymph node yield, and higher 3-year overall survival compared with CRR.

Indexed as

complete mesocolic excisionlaparoscopyright-sided colon cancer

Identifiers

PMID31576169
PMCPMC6768124
OpenAlexW2977141978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.