Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31575917›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

On the efficiency of chemotactic pursuit - Comparing blind search with temporal and spatial gradient sensing.

Claus Metzner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claus MetznerBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. claus.metzner@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-4306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chemotaxis, cells are modulating their migration patterns in response to concentration gradients of a guiding substance. Immune cells are believed to use such chemotactic sensing for remotely detecting and homing in on pathogens. Considering that immune cells may encounter a multitude of targets with vastly different migration properties, ranging from immobile to highly mobile, it is not clear which strategies of chemotactic pursuit are simultaneously efficient and versatile. We tackle this problem theoretically and define a tunable response function that maps temporal or spatial concentration gradients to migration behavior. The seven free parameters of this response function are optimized numerically with the objective of maximizing search efficiency against a wide spectrum of target cell properties. Finally, we reverse-engineer the best-performing parameter sets to uncover strategies of chemotactic pursuit that are efficient under different biologically realistic boundary conditions. Although strategies based on the temporal or spatial sensing of chemotactic gradients are significantly more efficient than unguided migration, such 'blind search' turns out to work surprisingly well, in particular if the immune cells are fast and directionally persistent. The resulting simulated data can be used for the design of chemotaxis experiments and for the development of algorithms that automatically detect and quantify goal oriented behavior in measured immune cell trajectories.

Identifiers

PMID31575917
PMCPMC6773759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.