Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31575902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Metabolome and microbiome profiling of a stress-sensitive rat model of gut-brain axis dysfunction.

Shalome A Bassett, Wayne Young, Karl Fraser, Julie E Dalziel, Jim Webster, Leigh Ryan, Patrick Fitzgerald, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G Dinan, John F Cryan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Diet Enriched withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shalome A BassettFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Wayne YoungFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Karl FraserFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1136-4024
Julie E DalzielFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand. julie.dalziel@agresearch.co.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-2351
Jim WebsterFarm Systems North, AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Leigh RyanFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Patrick FitzgeraldLaboratory of Neurogastroenterology, APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Catherine StantonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioural Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Timothy G DinanLaboratory of Neurogastroenterology, APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John F CryanLaboratory of Neurogastroenterology, APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5887-2723
Gerard ClarkeLaboratory of Neurogastroenterology, APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Niall HylandLaboratory of Neurogastroenterology, APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Nicole C RoyFood Nutrition & Health, AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZUniversity College Cork · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress negatively impacts gut and brain health. Individual differences in response to stress have been linked to genetic and environmental factors and more recently, a role for the gut microbiota in the regulation of stress-related changes has been demonstrated. However, the mechanisms by which these factors influence each other are poorly understood, and there are currently no established robust biomarkers of stress susceptibility. To determine the metabolic and microbial signatures underpinning physiological stress responses, we compared stress-sensitive Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats to the normo-anxious Sprague Dawley (SD) strain. Here we report that acute stress-induced strain-specific changes in brain lipid metabolites were a prominent feature in WKY rats. The relative abundance of Lactococcus correlated with the relative proportions of many brain lipids. In contrast, plasma lipids were significantly elevated in response to stress in SD rats, but not in WKY rats. Supporting these findings, we found that the greatest difference between the SD and WKY microbiomes were the predicted relative abundance of microbial genes involved in lipid and energy metabolism. Our results provide potential insights for developing novel biomarkers of stress vulnerability, some of which appear genotype specific.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactococcusLipid MetabolismLipidsMaleMetabolomeRatsRats, Inbred WKYRats, Sprague-DawleyStress, PhysiologicalLipids

Identifiers

PMID31575902
PMCPMC6773725
OpenAlexW2977421651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.