ArticleScientific reports2019
Earth-Gravity Congruent Motion Facilitates Ocular Control for Pursuit of Parabolic Trajectories.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Psychophysical evidence for an internal model of gravity in the visual and vestibular estimates of vertical motion duration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Target interception in virtual reality is better for natural versus unnatural trajectory shapes and orientations.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Computational account for the naturalness perception of others' jumping motion based on a vertical projectile motion model.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Visuomotor predictors of interception.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Grounding Intuitive Physics in Perceptual Experience.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Review
- Cues for predictive eye movements in naturalistic scenes.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- The impact of visually simulated self-motion on predicting object motion-A registered report protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Flexible viewing time when estimating time-to-contact in 3D parabolic trajectories.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Perceptual judgments of duration of parabolic motions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of "Visual" Gravity.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Review
- Gravity and Known Size Calibrate Visual Information to Time Parabolic Trajectories.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Gravity prior in human behaviour: a perceptual or semantic phenomenon?Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Determining mean and standard deviation of the strong gravity prior through simulations.PloS one · 2020Article
- Visuomotor Interactions and Perceptual Judgments in Virtual Reality Simulating Different Levels of Gravity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is evidence that humans rely on an earth gravity (9.81 m/s²) prior for a series of tasks involving perception and action, the reason being that gravity helps predict future positions of moving objects. Eye-movements in turn are partially guided by predictions about observed motion. Thus, the question arises whether knowledge about gravity is also used to guide eye-movements: If humans rely on a representation of earth gravity for the control of eye movements, earth-gravity-congruent motion should elicit improved visual pursuit. In a pre-registered experiment, we presented participants (n = 10) with parabolic motion governed by six different gravities (-1/0.7/0.85/1/1.15/1.3 g), two initial vertical velocities and two initial horizontal velocities in a 3D environment. Participants were instructed to follow the target with their eyes. We tracked their gaze and computed the visual gain (velocity of the eyes divided by velocity of the target) as proxy for the quality of pursuit. An LMM analysis with gravity condition as fixed effect and intercepts varying per subject showed that the gain was lower for -1 g than for 1 g (by -0.13, SE = 0.005). This model was significantly better than a null model without gravity as fixed effect (p < 0.001), supporting our hypothesis. A comparison of 1 g and the remaining gravity conditions revealed that 1.15 g (by 0.043, SE = 0.005) and 1.3 g (by 0.065, SE = 0.005) were associated with lower gains, while 0.7 g (by 0.054, SE = 0.005) and 0.85 g (by 0.029, SE = 0.005) were associated with higher gains. This model was again significantly better than a null model (p < 0.001), contradicting our hypothesis. Post-hoc analyses reveal that confounds in the 0.7/0.85/1/1.15/1.3 g condition may be responsible for these contradicting results. Despite these discrepancies, our data thus provide some support for the hypothesis that internalized knowledge about earth gravity guides eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.