Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31575610›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2019

PRC2 functions in development and congenital disorders.

Orla Deevy, Adrian P Bracken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Investigating oncoprotein-mediated chromatin dysregulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. An EED/PRC2-H19 Loop Regulates Cerebellar Development.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  19. Chromatin modifiers in neurodevelopment.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Orla DeevySmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-843X
Adrian P BrackenSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland adrian.bracken@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-9443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a conserved chromatin regulator that is responsible for the methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27). PRC2 is essential for normal development and its loss of function thus results in a range of developmental phenotypes. Here, we review the latest advances in our understanding of mammalian PRC2 activity and present an updated summary of the phenotypes associated with its loss of function in mice. We then discuss recent studies that have highlighted regulatory interplay between the modifications laid down by PRC2 and other chromatin modifiers, including NSD1 and DNMT3A. Finally, we propose a model in which the dysregulation of these modifications at intergenic regions is a shared molecular feature of genetically distinct but highly phenotypically similar overgrowth syndromes in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsCongenital AbnormalitiesEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansMammalsModels, BiologicalPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Signal TransductionPolycomb Repressive Complex 2DNMT3ANSD1PRC2Sotos syndromeTatton-Brown–Rahman syndromeWeaver syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31575610
PMCPMC6803372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.