Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31575580›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR): a clinical quality registry to monitor and improve care in upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Ashika D Maharaj, Jennifer F Holland, Ri O Scarborough, Sue M Evans, Liane J Ioannou, Wendy Brown, Daniel G Croagh, Charles H C Pilgrim, James G Kench, Lara R Lipton and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effects of enteral tube feeding on nutrition, survival, and quality of life outcomes in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Ashika D Maharaj *Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-613X
Jennifer F Holland *Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ri O ScarboroughPublic Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sue M EvansPublic Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-8400
Liane J IoannouPublic Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wendy BrownDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel G CroaghMonash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-6741
Charles H C PilgrimAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James G KenchRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Lara R LiptonWestern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Trevor LeongPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John J McNeilPublic Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mehrdad NikfarjamDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ahmad AlyAustin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul R BurtonDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul A CashinMonash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julie ChuPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cuong P DuongPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter EvansPeninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David GoldsteinNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew HaydonAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael W HiiSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brett P F KnowlesRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neil D MerrettSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael MichaelPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel E NealePopulation Health Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jennifer PhilipSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-0645
Ian W T PorterCabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Marty SmithAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John SpillanePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter P TagkalidisAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John R ZalcbergPublic Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia john.zalcberg@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR) was developed to monitor and improve the quality of care provided to patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers in Australia.

participantsIt supports four cancer modules: pancreatic, oesophagogastric, biliary and primary liver cancer. The pancreatic cancer (PC) module was the first module to be implemented, with others being established in a staged approach. Individuals are recruited to the registry if they are aged 18 years or older, have received care for their cancer at a participating public/private hospital or private clinic in Australia and do not opt out of participation. FINDINGS TO DATE: The UGICR is governed by a multidisciplinary steering committee that provides clinical governance and oversees clinical working parties. The role of the working parties is to develop quality indicators based on best practice for each registry module, develop the minimum datasets and provide guidance in analysing and reporting of results. Data are captured from existing data sources (population-based cancer incidence registries, pathology databases and hospital-coded data) and manually from clinical records. Data collectors directly enter information into a secure web-based Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data collection platform. The PC module began with a pilot phase, and subsequently, we used a formal modified Delphi consensus process to establish a core set of quality indicators for PC. The second module developed was the oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) module. Results of the 1 year pilot phases for PC and OGC modules are included in this cohort profile. FUTURE PLANS: The UGICR will provide regular reports of risk-adjusted, benchmarked performance on a range of quality indicators that will highlight variations in care and clinical outcomes at a health service level. The registry has also been developed with the view to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which will further add to our understanding of the care of patients with these cancers.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaBiliary Tract NeoplasmsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsQuality ImprovementStomach Neoplasmsbiliary cancerclinical registrydatabasegastric cancerliver canceroesophageal cancerpancreatic cancerpopulation healthquality improvementquality of careupper gastrointestinal cancers

Identifiers

PMID31575580
PMCPMC6773358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.